Searching for solar…
25 excerpts
saying we don't. Um when we was dealing with with solar um the the ground that is uh adjacent to Breenidge County where the solar farm…problem with me county at that time was there was no regulation on solar whatsoever
several miles away from where we are proposing to build the New Frontier solar park or Clover Creek solar Park so that to me says that concerns that…were hearing at that public hearing were broadly about solar but not just about our project so I would really encourage you to um think of a different…believe 306 acres and about 145 of it can be used for solar I mean my next question would be can you can you farm that rest
setback Woods lots of things that are on the land already that prohibit solar from being placed on the land but many of those areas pipelines transmission lines…been run off their own property because they've done least to the solar Fe things is not under solar so that's wrong that has happen happened…County on on the on 79 that has happened they don't have solar pounds but they the solar panels have yet to be installed however they
around this place couldn't come with an agreement exactly if I want solar and all my neighbors surrounding neighbors said it's okay…reads right now I wish we could if all the neighbors agree that solar can go to the property line then let solar go to the property line
more efficient in the Solar design so if your concern truly is the amount of Acres that will be converted to solar in this County the setbacks…accomplish that goal of limiting the amount of land used for solar putting a cap I don't like that either because I'm a solar developer…build solar so I definitely don't like a cap but the benefit of the cap is that you're limiting the overall amount while you're still
take care if we do this to solar we need to do it to everybody and I'm not for solar I don't like it eating…like it but it CH and wek you try to limit solar from Farmland we need the limits of try to do something uh F County or Woodford
something than nothing. — I agree. — And and you know, look at solar. We're getting $100,000 a year. A measily $100,000 a year. Do you know…want to be owners, the taxpayers of the county be owners of any solar panels in this county. That's how you get your
case pending for the Green River Clover Creek, I'm sorry, Clover Creek solar project. And the decision came down from the Court of Appeals about 10 days…that ruled in favor of the solar company. So, our next step is to uh either abide by that
want to it's the that's fine it's the Murray State solar panel study okay so after I guess in November um after…Court meetings where we discussed getting more information about the upcoming solar project I reach
here's something else you're going to want% — that little dab of solar. And I'm not a sober man really, but in urban bringing in over
ordinance 2022 0321 addressing and establishing minimum setback screening and decommissioning requirements for solar energy system installations and whereas the Breen County Fiscal Court upon thorough review…better address the Contemporary needs and interest of both the County residents and solar energy systems as defined herein and whereas pursuant to KRS 67.0 A3 the Breen
applications for Breckinridge County Ordinance No. 2022-0321 Levels Two and Three Solar Energy Systems. Judge Lucas called for a vote on the motion, SIX MEMBERS PRESENT VOTING…JUDGE LUCAS ABSTAINED (6-0). RE: New Frontier Solar - Memorandum of Understanding Subsequent to discussion, Esquire Henning made a motion to table the New Frontier Solar Memorandum
planning and drones for solar and data centers. Wouldn't can principal court address that without planning and zoning? — Court can address that without planning and zoning…regulations in place to follow. — It would be each pl each time a solar or data center wanted to come in. This board could just address that coming
item of old business is the second reading of ordinance number 2025 10121 solar energy systems you want to read that far cona Kentucky bre andri County Fiscal…ordinance repealing brick andri County Fiscal Court ordinance 2022 d321 for solar energy system installations in Breen County Kentucky whereas the bre County Fiscal Court in pursuance
Natural Resources we're supposed to have control that we're singling solar people if this passes we need to keep an eye on development in general subdivision…people don't realize this I'm not really for large scale solar but it's your property I'm not in favor of development of I mean
they're not popular industries, but they are still target industries uh in solar and in data centers to prevent those from locating in the community. And while…want to dig in a bit with our experience in the solar industry as an example. Members of the court know that while we did not recruit…solar developers of the area, we worked closely with them for several years while they were working to build
write something that protected us cuz I'm — Yeah. So, the the first solar ordinance that was passed in 2022, I feel like was rushed into
doerty I've had a bunch of people tell me telling the Solar Company what they can do with your property I said this in the public hearing…guys want to go out and put solar panels up then there's no restriction for that we're we are controlling what the Solar Company does…about this and uh they said that it is okay for uh the Solar Company to go to a neighbor and basically buy out that setback
publicly dedicated or maintained roadway or railway in the new proposed solar ordinance. Judge Lucas called for a vote on the motion, FOUR MEMBERS PRESENT VOTING AYE; JUDGE…publicly dedicated or maintained roadway or railway in the new proposed solar ordinance and seconded by Esquire Albright. Judge Lucas called for a vote on the motion, FOUR
Laura Fentress, County Treasurer Absent: Sam Moore, Magistrate, District 5 NEW BUSINESS RE: Solar Ordinance Discussion Esquire Greenwell introduced a new Solar Ordinance proposing a minimum…Greenwell made a motion to have 15t Reading of Ordinance No. 2024-1223, Solar Ordinance. Judge Lucas stated that the agenda called for discussion only and that
understand it that the farmer is responsible outside the fence, but he the solar company hadn't released it yet. They
part of the problem is um the the deal with the solar um the court of appeals ruled that our ordinance was a planning and zoning ordinance which…would be redundant to to do something similar to what we did with solar when we're fighting that lawsuit currently. — So let's get on that before
talked before that we didn't think our electric grid could support solar — and we we got to a mess on that one. I think these are completely
Solar Energy Systems. Subsequent to discussion, Judge Lucas called for a vote on the motion, FIVE MEMBERS PRESENT VOTING NAY; JUDGE LUCAS AND ESQUIRE MOORE VOTING
that, we're just opening them up for a lawsuit from the solar company. — Right. Well, I mean, a lot of what I'm talking about